Direct Drop/Tweet numbers selected: 4523-4535
 Full Search Query:  ##4523-4535 
    Sort Zero Δ
  • Q Drops
  • X Posts
  • TRUTH
Q Drops: 13
Digging Options: Inactive    
TZ Select: DST: Yes
Calendar Select:
Visitors (last) - Minute: 32 Hour: 581 24 Hours: 8170  
4535       
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 06/28/2020 15:56:10 ID: 2a9c6e
8kun/qresearch: 9778683

A person(s) value:
1. vote
2. monetary value (tax contribution)
3.
Why is 'free thought' ridiculed, challenged, and threatened when a person is opposed to the 'mainstream-narrative'?
[2] remains fixed (degree allowable by 'economic recession/expansion')
[1] remains a variable
[1] dependent on a 'controlled' system of information dissemination
What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations?
What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology?
What happens when the news is no longer free from bias?
What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent?
What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy?
What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party?
Fact becomes fiction?
Fiction becomes fact?
When does news become propaganda?
Identity creation?
How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?
Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?
Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?
‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].
[If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true]
Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?
Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?
Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources?
Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?
Threat to intellectual freedom?
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Read again – digest.
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
THINK BLM PUSH EVERY 4-YEARS.
Logical thinking.
Why, after the election of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of election, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, racism, every other ‘ism’?
How much of the population still believes POTUS colluded w/ RUSSIA due to MSDNC 365-blitz?
No MSDNC retraction of POTUS_RUSSIA collusion narrative [propaganda]? _why?
Pre/post 2016 election?
Why were[are] violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded and allowed to operate within [D] controlled cities [safe-zones]?
Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/gender, race, [ism]?
When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative.
Control of the narrative = power
When you are blind, what do you see?
They want you divided.
Divided by religion.
Divided by race.
Divided by sex.
Divided by political affiliation.
Divided by class.
When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers].
Divided you are weak.
Divided you pose no threat to their control.
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep].
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Q
4534       
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 06/26/2020 20:35:53 ID: 1ed764
8kun/qresearch: 9760450

4533       
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 06/26/2020 20:24:00 ID: 1ed764
8kun/qresearch: 9760239

Anonymous 06/26/2020 20:21:07 ID:dcb4cd
8kun/qresearch: 9760174
>>9760164
Grammar kitty?
Or on purpose?


>>9760174
[ES]
Mistakes to you are roadmaps to others.
Q
4532       
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 06/26/2020 20:20:15 ID: 1ed764
8kun/qresearch: 9760164

As the darkness falls so does our enemies.
Q
4531       
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 06/26/2020 20:18:19 ID: 1ed764
8kun/qresearch: 9760134

https://twitter.com/stephersford/status/1276625593828880387
The next few weeks will demonstrate our resolve.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q
4530       
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 06/26/2020 20:15:35 ID: 1ed764
8kun/qresearch: 9760093

https://twitter.com/elenochle
Rising to the occasion.
Understanding what's at stake.
God bless each and every one of you.
We will not fail.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q
4529       
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 06/26/2020 16:02:11 ID: 0b2f6b
8kun/qresearch: 9757400

https://twitter.com/HouseGOP/status/1276589294010982401
Did order(s) violate government mandated policies?
Would a jury of peers agree their actions were reckless?
Would a jury of peers agree their actions were negligent?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-11/suits-against-state-officials
"The immunity of a state from suit has long been held not to extend to actions against state officials for damages arising out of willful and negligent disregard of state laws.165 The reach of the rule is evident in Scheuer v. Rhodes,166 in which the Court held that plaintiffs were not barred by the Eleventh Amendment or other immunity doctrines from suing the governor and other officials of a state alleging that they deprived plaintiffs of federal rights under color of state law and seeking damages, when it was clear that plaintiffs were seeking to impose individual and personal liability on the officials. There was no “executive immunity” from suit, the Court held; rather, the immunity of state officials is qualified and varies according to the scope of discretion and responsibilities of the particular office and the circumstances existing at the time the challenged action was taken."
Q
4528       
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 06/26/2020 00:13:12 ID: 6ad4b3
8kun/qresearch: 9750472

4527       
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 06/26/2020 00:07:20 ID: 6ad4b3
8kun/qresearch: 9750369

Anonymous 06/26/2020 00:00:33 ID:42c812
8kun/qresearch: 9750276
Image Name: ClipboardImage.png
Filename: 59009585ade0f01bd509236af6d65be655eeed102e8ae9875dae785abbb277e5.png

Wow!!! Another 0 delta.


>>9750276
3 seconds.
Dan is to blame.
Q
4526       
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 06/25/2020 23:54:46 ID: 6ad4b3
8kun/qresearch: 9750210

Image Name: 23604.png
Filename: 8d954a26bc0d201f360398033498d8b5ffab4b30fd4b52b622a03c59b83a425e.png

https://twitter.com/juliacarriew/status/1276275098870112256
Daily attacks are normal.
But, what are the odds this particular hit re: FB censorship push comes the next day? [think battlefield and mission(s)]
The 'Guardian'.
Information Warfare.
Q
4525       
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 06/25/2020 22:53:42 ID: 2e1312
8kun/qresearch: 9749513

4524       
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 06/25/2020 22:21:59 ID: 2e1312
8kun/qresearch: 9749096

https://twitter.com/Tdawg0925/status/1276334965492416513
Good catch.
Coincidence?
Important people understand for future events.
Assumption or intel based?
All assets [F][D] deployed.
[D] + China = 11.3
Q
4523       
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 06/25/2020 15:16:38 ID: 19f964
8kun/qresearch: 9744864

https://twitter.com/QanonWga/status/1276229137603063809
Praying for a swift recovery to your back [keep fighting! never give up!].
United and Strong.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q
Page build time: 0.03622 seconds